One of the 59,054,087

Yes, four more years of great, moral leadership What is wrong with that?. And since you asked, I would be glad to tell you.

George Bush is a man of courage and conviction. He assesses the situation and makes a decision and then stick to the decision instead of waffling and wondering how everyone will react to it. Unlike his "gracious" opponent who has a position for every voter, George has shown his ability to provide steady, consistent leadership in terribly tough times.

More important, he is willing to confront evil as evil. These mindless terrorists are fanatics. They are determined to impose their view of the world on others, whether they like it or not. No amount of sensitive leadership is going to change that. You don't negotiate with evil. You wipe it out. IF Kerry had become President, Britain as you know it today would have been equally at risk. Your economy and way of life would hijacked for the political and social agenda of evil. You cannot negotiate with someone who does not value honesty, integrity, compassion and equality. These idiots are after your freedom, just like they after ours.

While you may have some valuable insights into American politics, you may have missed some of the nuances. Let me enlighten you.

First, Americans who voted for Bush are not dumb. They are not fanatics and they are not blinded by ideology. In fact, it is the liberal mindset who has been clouded by their fear and hatred. What do they hate? They hate anything that stands against immorality and the elimination of human rights. Unfortunately, they don't see it that way. They think being liberal is more enlightened. They are in fact slaves to their own ideology.

Second, make no mistake about it, this election was not about Iraq , US foreign policy or the domestic agenda. This election was about 30,000,000 murdered souls in America over the last 30+ years. It is about protecting the family and children from the homosexual agenda to have their lifestyle choices recognized and accepted as legitimate. It was about integrity and character.

Third, in th US, a small minority of advocates have managed to hijack the media. Through the inappropriate use of the media, they have convinced a large percentage of Americans it is ok to kill babies, that it is ok to do whatever you want whenever you want. This minority of social radicals believe they know what is best for everyone and are willing to go to any lengths to impose their standards of behavior and convictions on those who don't agree. And when someone disagress, these liberal changemongers call us stupid and tell us we are blinded by false ideology.

There is no limit to what they will do to get their way. They will blatantly lie. They will produce documentaries that are slanted and outright dishonest to prove their point. They will coerce and cajole anyone who shows weakness. All the while believing they are doing this for the good of America.

I am here to tell you, character does count. Winning through intimidation, lying and misrepresentation is not right. It will never work. Having a point of view and sharing it with others is what makes for interesting conversation. but when it becomes demagoury and becomes violent that is not ok.

Today, for these people, everything is not about self. They are self delusional and narcassistic. Their mindset says "I need to protect my self from everyone else." It has pushed well meaning people to make bad decisions. Britian's society as well as ours, is no longer focused on serving others. We are focused on grabbing the brass ring and going for the gusto.

What happened to caring for the widows and orphans? What happened to raising children in a sheltered environment until they were old enough to understand their choices. Today those choices are forced upon them by the time they 8 years old and perhaps younger.

What happened to civil disscussion? Why would your paper want to alienate 59,000,000 people by calling them dumb. Does that make you smart? Because you disagree, does that make your set of values, your worldview right and mine wrong. And becuase mine is wrong I am stupid?

Until your liberal cohorts learn to reason rationally, without name calling and creating rancor where it does not have to exist - there will be this divide. Why would anyone on the "stupid" side try to reason with you, since you are so intellectually superior? What would be the point?

If you want civil discourse, they you have to earn it. That would start by acknowledging your worldview is different than mine - but it does not make mine stupid. Calling 59,000,000 people stupid is immature and juvenile. And that is precisely why Kerry lost. I hope you have the courage to print this so your readers can see there is another point of view.